Well I don’t think that, but some people on DIG certainly did. Danny had his 25 things he hates about google piece posted up on dig and the masses ripped it up. After reading through the first 20 posts saying what a moron Danny is, how he doesn’t know squat about search, and my favorite argument “go build your own smarty pants” it is obvious that they are not worth talking to or about.
Interestingly though Danny gets on and vigorously defends his position. Even when it becomes painfully obvious that the Diggers are trolls, he just keeps on invalidating out there poor arguments with in depth responses.
I am left wondering, Why would he do that ? I would have just ignored it and let them burn my effigy. When a man with as much experience online as Danny goes completely against my conventional wisdom, I have to stop and reconsider it.
Perhaps a there’s lesson to be learned here.
thanks to Aaron for pointing it out
Like it? Subscribe to the blog if you haven't already
Related Posts
Online Marketing Strategy 101
Another Day, Another post deleted on WebmasterWorld
COLD CASE: Who killed Threadwatch Last Year?
Really Really Bad Writing





Yea that is weird not sure why he did it.
Effigy hell, they’re serving up a heaping helping of roast Danny over there.
Pretty amusing if you ask me, it’s kind of like feeding kittens to rottweilers, just stand back and see who wins.
He should get out with only a few singed curly hairs before someone that attends SES takes note and spreads the word,